Proficiency scale
| Level | Definition | Can they be on call for it? |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No exposure | No |
| 1 | Aware: understands concepts, cannot perform tasks | No |
The question a skills matrix should answer is not who is good at what. It is which skills exist in exactly one person's head. That number is a continuity risk you can act on cheaply before anyone resigns.
Define the proficiency levels in words. Without definitions, a 3 means different things to a confident person and a cautious one. Anchor each level: 1 is aware, 3 is works unsupervised, 5 is the person others escalate to.
Calculate bus factor per skill. Count how many people rate 3 or above. Any critical skill with a count of one is a continuity risk, and it is far cheaper to fix now than after a resignation.
Prioritise by criticality, not by gap size. A large gap in a rarely-needed skill matters less than a small gap in something you depend on daily. Rate criticality and work the intersection.
Here's a preview. Unlock the free download to get all 4 sections (3 more below).
| Level | Definition | Can they be on call for it? |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No exposure | No |
| 1 | Aware: understands concepts, cannot perform tasks | No |
More free templates IT teams use alongside this one.
A rota is more than a list of names against dates. This template covers the parts that cause real pages to go unanswered: who the secondary is, what happens when nobody acknowledges, and what the outgoing engineer must hand over.
IT roadmaps become wish lists because they list initiatives without capacity. Showing what the team can actually deliver alongside what has been requested is what turns the roadmap into a prioritisation conversation.
Disaster recovery restores the systems. Business continuity answers what people do in the meantime, and that gap is where most organisations have nothing written down, because it belongs to departments rather than to IT.
The number of people who could carry out a given task competently. Informally, how many people would need to be unavailable before the capability is lost. Any critical skill with a bus factor of one is a continuity risk.
On a defined scale with written anchors, typically 0 to 5, where 3 means working unsupervised on routine tasks and 5 means being the escalation point. Without written definitions, ratings reflect confidence rather than capability.
Finding single points of failure in critical skills, planning training against those gaps, assessing whether the team can support an upcoming change such as a platform migration, and checking an on-call rota has adequate coverage for each skill.