Client details
- Client name
- Service tier purchased
- Contract start date
MSP onboarding determines the margin on an account for its entire life. Estates documented properly in the first thirty days generate predictable ticket volumes; estates taken on blind generate surprises that get absorbed into a fixed fee.
Document before you take responsibility. Discovery is where margin is won or lost. An undocumented legacy server, an unsupported line-of-business app, or an unpatched estate discovered in month three becomes unbilled work under a fixed fee.
Verify tooling coverage, do not assume it. Reconcile agent counts against the asset list. Devices without an agent are invisible, and the first you hear of them is a ticket about a machine you did not know existed.
Gate the handover to support. Define what must be true before the service desk takes the account: documentation complete, agents deployed, escalation paths agreed. Accounts handed over early generate escalations the team cannot resolve.
Here's a preview. Unlock the free download to get all 4 sections (3 more below).
More free templates IT teams use alongside this one.
Pricing an MSP contract from user count alone is how accounts become unprofitable. The questions that predict support load are about the estate's condition and the business's tolerance for downtime, not its headcount.
A QBR that reports ticket counts tells the client what they already suspect, that they pay you and things happen. A QBR that prices the risks you are carrying and proposes specific remediation creates both renewal confidence and new work.
Documentation is the difference between an engineer resolving a ticket in ten minutes and spending an hour rediscovering an estate. The standard matters less than the requirement that it is complete and verifiably current.
Typically four to six weeks for a mid-sized client: two weeks of discovery, two of tooling deployment and remediation, and the remainder on service enablement and handover. Rushing discovery is what causes unbilled work later.
Verifying tooling coverage against the asset list, and establishing the real backup position by testing a restore rather than trusting the console. Both failures surface months later as incidents the client expects you to own.
Yes, in writing, especially unsupported systems, patch backlogs, and backup gaps. It sets expectations, protects your margin by making remediation a separate conversation, and is the basis of the first quarterly review.