Performance metrics
| Metric | This month | Last month | Target | Amber | Red | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tickets received | 412 | 388 | - | - | - | Up 6%: new starter intake |
| Tickets resolved | 419 | 381 | ≥ received | - | - | Backlog reduced by 7 |
Service desk reporting usually optimises for speed, which is measurable, rather than for demand reduction, which is valuable. The most useful number on this sheet is which ticket categories keep recurring.
Report demand alongside throughput. Resolving 400 tickets efficiently is less valuable than eliminating the 60 that recur every month. Track top categories and repeat callers to find what to fix at source.
Avoid metrics that reward the wrong behaviour. Tickets closed per agent encourages premature closure and ticket splitting. Pair any volume metric with reopen rate and CSAT so the trade-off is visible.
Explain movements in the commentary. A 20% rise in tickets caused by a migration is good news badly presented. Without commentary, every movement looks like a performance issue.
Here's a preview. Unlock the free download to get all 4 sections (3 more below).
| Metric | This month | Last month | Target | Amber | Red | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tickets received | 412 | 388 | - | - | - | Up 6%: new starter intake |
| Tickets resolved | 419 | 381 | ≥ received | - | - | Backlog reduced by 7 |
More free templates IT teams use alongside this one.
A priority matrix only earns its place if two different agents classify the same ticket the same way. This one defines impact and urgency as countable things (how many people, and whether work has already stopped), so the grid produces one answer instead of a conversation.
IT dashboards drift toward metrics that are easy to collect rather than ones that change decisions. The test for every metric here is simple: if it moved, would anyone do anything differently?
Most internal IT SLAs are copied from a managed-service contract and then quietly abandoned, because they promise things the team was never staffed to deliver. This one starts from what you measurably do today and makes the exclusions explicit, so the document survives contact with a bad month.
First contact resolution, median time to first response and to resolve, SLA attainment, reopen rate, CSAT, and ageing backlog, alongside demand analysis showing which categories generate the most tickets, which is where the real improvement sits.
Because resolving recurring tickets efficiently is less valuable than eliminating them. A category generating seventy tickets a month that could be removed with self-service is worth more than a few percentage points of speed.
Tickets closed per agent, which encourages premature closure and splitting one issue into several. Always pair volume metrics with reopen rate and customer satisfaction so the trade-off is visible rather than hidden.