Automox vs PDQ Connect

Automox and PDQ Connect are both cloud-based patch management tools targeting IT teams moving away from on-premises WSUS and PDQ Deploy.

Automox supports Windows, macOS, and Linux with a mature policy-based patching model and Worklets automation library.

PDQ Connect is PDQ's cloud evolution of PDQ Deploy, optimized for Windows environments and bundling inventory scanning alongside patch and software deployment.

For Windows-only environments already familiar with PDQ, the comparison is primarily about price, automation depth, and whether cross-platform coverage matters.

Written by Rajat GuptaFact-checked by ChandrasmitaReviewed Oct 15, 2026

Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure

Verdict

For most IT teams, Automox's pricing advantage is decisive. At $3 to $5/endpoint vs PDQ Connect's $18/device, Automox is significantly cheaper for patch management. PDQ Connect's premium only makes sense for Windows-only shops where the package library and inventory depth deliver concrete operational value.

Automox is the default choice for cross-platform patch management at competitive pricing. PDQ Connect makes sense for Windows-only PDQ Deploy migrations. The premium is only justified by the package library and inventory depth.

Automox and PDQ Connect compared

Automox logo

Automox

Automox gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Endpoint-based pricing, Cloud deployment, Windows, macOS, Linux operating-system support, and a trial path for early validation.

Automox is usually a better fit when cloud, endpoint-based, and Windows, macOS, Linux line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.

PDQ Connect logo

PDQ Connect

PDQ Connect gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Endpoint-based pricing, Cloud deployment, Windows operating-system support, and a trial path for early validation.

PDQ Connect is usually a better fit when cloud, endpoint-based, and Windows line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.

Automox vs PDQ Connect

CriteriaAutomoxPDQ Connect
Deployment modelCloud-nativeCloud-native
Free planNo (14-day trial)No (14-day trial)
Starting price$3/endpoint/mo (Patch)$18/device/year (Plus, 100-device minimum)
Windows patchingYesYes
macOS patchingYesNo
Linux patchingYesNo
Third-party app patchingYes (800+ apps)Yes (via PDQ package library)
Automation scriptingYes (Worklets: $5/endpoint tier)Yes (built-in scripting)
Community automation libraryYes (Worklet library)Yes (PDQ package library)
Software deploymentYes (via Worklets)Yes (core feature)
Hardware/software inventoryBasicYes (PDQ Inventory bundled)
HIPAA compliance reportingYesNo
MSP / multi-tenantYesNo
Remote script executionYes (Patch + Worklets tier)Yes
On-premises optionNoNo
G2 rating4.4/54.6/5

Pricing comparison

Automox tiers: Basic $2/endpoint/mo (limited), Patch $3/endpoint/mo, Patch + Worklets $5/endpoint/mo. Annual billing available.

PDQ Connect is priced per device per year, not per month. Checked against pdq.com/pricing/connect on 17 March 2026: Basic is $12 per device per year, Plus is $18 and Premium is $28, each with a 100-device minimum. Plus is the tier most teams buy, and it bundles Windows patching, software deployment and asset inventory scanning in one subscription.

At 300 endpoints Automox Patch at $3 per endpoint per month costs $900 a month, or $10,800 a year. PDQ Connect Plus at $18 per device per year costs $5,400 a year, about $450 a month. PDQ Connect is roughly half the cost of Automox Patch at that size, and it includes inventory scanning. Automox earns its higher rate on macOS and Linux coverage and on Worklets automation, not on price, so the comparison turns on whether the estate is Windows-only.

Published plans

ProductPlanPublished priceWhat it covers
AutomoxBasic$2 /endpoint/moOS patching only, Limited third-party apps, Basic reporting
AutomoxPatch$3 /endpoint/moFull OS + third-party patching (800+ apps), Compliance reporting (NIST, CIS, HIPAA), API access
AutomoxPatch + Worklets$5 /endpoint/moAll Patch features, Worklets automation, Remote script execution, Community Worklet library
PDQ ConnectPDQ Connect Plus$18 /device/year (100-device minimum)Windows patch management, Software deployment, PDQ package library, Asset inventory scanning, Remote script execution

Who should use Automox

Automox suits IT teams managing mixed OS environments and organizations that want a mature, proven platform with compliance reporting and a Worklet automation library. Its tiered pricing scales well for larger endpoint counts.

  • Organizations managing Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints from one console
  • IT teams that want pre-built automation (Worklets) for configuration management beyond patching
  • Security teams needing HIPAA, NIST, and CIS compliance reporting
  • MSPs managing multiple client environments in a multi-tenant console
  • Organizations at 200+ endpoints where per-endpoint pricing scales efficiently

Who should use PDQ Connect

PDQ Connect makes most sense for Windows-only environments already using PDQ Deploy on-premises and seeking a cloud migration path. Its bundled inventory and software deployment package library are valuable for IT admins who manage software deployment as heavily as patching.

  • Windows-only environments migrating from PDQ Deploy on-premises to cloud
  • IT teams that rely heavily on PDQ's pre-built software deployment package library
  • Organizations that want detailed hardware and software inventory bundled with patching
  • IT admins who want platform continuity from the legacy PDQ ecosystem
  • Environments where software deployment, beyond patching, is a primary workflow

Automation

Automox Worklets are modular scripts (PowerShell, bash, Python) that can be scheduled, triggered by policy conditions, and shared via a community Worklet library. The library contains hundreds of pre-built routines for common IT tasks (application configuration, security hardening, compliance checks) contributed by the Automox community. Worklets are available on the Patch + Worklets tier at $5/endpoint/mo. PDQ Connect has a deep pre-built package library inherited from PDQ Deploy's decade-plus history. IT admins can deploy hundreds of common business applications with pre-configured packages without writing scripts. The community packages cover everything from Chrome installers to complex enterprise app deployments. Both have community automation libraries. Automox's Worklets are more script-oriented (configuration and automation beyond installation). PDQ's library excels at software deployment with complex install parameters already handled.

Cross-platform OS support

Automox supports Windows, macOS, and Linux from the same cloud console. Third-party patching catalogs cover all three platforms. This is particularly valuable for organizations with Mac users (common in design, marketing, and engineering teams) or Linux servers alongside Windows workstations. PDQ Connect is Windows-only. macOS and Linux endpoints require separate tools. For Windows-only organizations, this is a non-issue. For any organization with even a minority of non-Windows endpoints, PDQ Connect creates a tool gap. For MSPs managing diverse client environments, Automox's cross-platform coverage significantly reduces the tooling complexity compared to using PDQ Connect plus separate tools for Mac and Linux.

Inventory and asset management

PDQ Connect bundles PDQ Inventory, providing detailed hardware scanning, software inventory, registry data, and user activity. This level of inventory detail supports IT asset management workflows beyond patch status. Automox provides basic endpoint inventory (installed software, OS version, hardware specs) sufficient for understanding patch state but lighter than PDQ Inventory's detail level. For organizations where detailed inventory is a primary requirement alongside patching, PDQ Connect's bundled inventory has real value. For organizations primarily focused on patch management, Automox's basic inventory is sufficient and the cost difference ($3 vs $18/endpoint) is difficult to justify on inventory depth alone.

Migrating between platforms

Switching between Automox and PDQ Connect involves deploying the new agent to endpoints and recreating patch policies and automation workflows. Migrating from PDQ Connect to Automox requires porting PDQ package-based deployments to Automox Worklets or software deployment scripts. PDQ packages do not import directly into Automox. Migrating from Automox to PDQ Connect means recreating Worklet automation as PDQ packages or scripts.

  1. 1Document current patch policies, schedules, exclusion lists, and automation scripts
  2. 2Deploy new platform agent to pilot endpoint group
  3. 3Recreate patch policies and maintenance windows in target platform
  4. 4Port automation: PDQ packages → Automox Worklets (or vice versa)
  5. 5Validate patching coverage matches baseline
  6. 6Decommission old platform agents after successful validation

Integrations

Automox

  • ServiceNow
  • Splunk
  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Tenable.io
  • Rapid7
  • Jira
  • REST API
  • Zapier

PDQ Connect

  • Azure AD
  • Slack
  • REST API
  • ServiceNow (limited)
  • PDQ Deploy on-prem (parallel run)

Who should choose what

Choose Automox when

  • Mixed OS environments (Windows + macOS + Linux)
  • Organizations prioritizing cost efficiency at $3/endpoint vs $18/device
  • Teams that want HIPAA and PCI compliance reporting
  • MSPs managing multiple client environments in multi-tenant mode
  • IT teams looking for SIEM and vulnerability scanner integrations

Choose PDQ Connect when

  • Windows-only environments migrating from PDQ Deploy
  • IT admins who value PDQ's established package library for software deployment
  • Organizations where detailed hardware/software inventory is as important as patching
  • Teams that want platform continuity from the PDQ ecosystem

Side-by-side matrix

Side-by-side comparison of Automox vs PDQ Connect
Commercials
Pricing modelDiffersAutomoxPer endpoint per month; one published tier, two custom-quotedPDQ ConnectPer device per year, three published tiers, 100-device minimum
Free trialAutomoxAvailablePDQ ConnectAvailable
Entry priceDiffersAutomox$1 per endpoint per month for Patch OS, annual commitment, verified October 16, 2026PDQ Connect$12 per device per year on Basic at our March 17, 2026 check
TrialDiffersAutomoxFree trial of the full platform; length not published on the pricing pagePDQ Connect14 days for up to 250 devices, no credit card, as recorded in March 2026
Platform & deployment
DeploymentDiffersAutomoxCloud console with a lightweight endpoint agent; the vendor documents no on-premises consolePDQ ConnectCloud console with an agent that connects outbound over web sockets. No VPN, domain membership or SMB access required
Supported OSDiffersAutomoxWindows, macOS, LinuxPDQ ConnectWindows
PlatformsDiffersAutomoxWindows, macOS and Linux from one policy enginePDQ ConnectWindows and macOS. Linux is not supported
Fit & scope
Best forAutomoxEndpoint ManagementPDQ ConnectEndpoint Management
Best fitDiffersAutomoxDistributed estates closing a patch compliance gap without running patch infrastructurePDQ ConnectInternal IT teams of 100 to 1,000 mostly Windows devices that want patching and deployment, not an RMM

Frequently asked questions

Is Automox cheaper than PDQ Connect?

No, it is the other way round. Automox Patch is $3 per endpoint per month, which is $36 per endpoint per year. PDQ Connect Plus is $18 per device per year. At 200 endpoints Automox Patch costs $7,200 a year against PDQ Connect's $3,600, and PDQ Connect includes inventory scanning in that figure. Automox costs more because it patches macOS and Linux, which PDQ Connect does not.

Does PDQ Connect support macOS and Linux?

No. PDQ Connect is Windows-only. macOS and Linux endpoints require separate patch management tools. Automox patches Windows, macOS, and Linux from the same cloud console, making it more practical for organizations with mixed-OS environments.

Can Automox replace PDQ Deploy?

Automox can replace PDQ Deploy's patching and basic software deployment capabilities. However, if you rely heavily on PDQ's pre-built package library for complex software deployments, you will need to recreate those as Automox Worklets or deployment scripts. The patching migration is straightforward; replicating complex PDQ package deployments requires more effort.

What is Automox Worklets?

Worklets are Automox's automation scripts: modular PowerShell, bash, or Python scripts that can be scheduled, triggered by policy, and shared via Automox's community library. They handle automation tasks beyond patching: configuration management, software deployment, security hardening, and compliance checks. Worklets are available on the Patch + Worklets tier at $5/endpoint/mo.

Does PDQ Connect have multi-tenant support for MSPs?

No. PDQ Connect does not offer MSP-style multi-tenant management. Automox supports multi-tenant environments, allowing MSPs to manage multiple client organizations from a single console with separate policies, reports, and billing per tenant.

Is PDQ Connect good for mixed environments?

No. PDQ Connect manages Windows endpoints only. For organizations with macOS (common in creative and engineering teams) or Linux servers, PDQ Connect requires separate tools for non-Windows endpoints. Automox handles all three OS types from one console, significantly reducing tool fragmentation for mixed environments.

Does Automox include compliance reporting?

Yes. Automox Patch includes compliance reports mapped to NIST, CIS Benchmarks, and HIPAA frameworks. These reports help organizations document patch compliance for audits. PDQ Connect provides basic patching reports but does not include HIPAA or NIST-specific compliance report templates.

Can PDQ Connect be used with PDQ Deploy on-premises simultaneously?

Yes. PDQ Connect and PDQ Deploy on-premises can run in parallel during migration. Organizations can gradually migrate environments to PDQ Connect cloud while maintaining PDQ Deploy for on-premises workflows. This coexistence is helpful for phased migrations where not all endpoints can move to cloud immediately.

Which has a better third-party app catalog?

Automox has 800+ third-party applications for patching. PDQ Connect's catalog size is not publicly specified but benefits from PDQ's established package library for deployment. For pure patching catalog breadth, Automox's 800+ app coverage is one of the largest among cloud patch tools. PDQ's package library excels at complex software deployment scenarios rather than patching alone.

Which platform is easier to manage at scale?

Automox's policy-based architecture scales well. Patch policies apply to dynamic device groups based on OS, tags, or attributes. PDQ Connect's management model is more manual at large scale. Both are cloud-native, but Automox's policy-driven approach with Worklets automation is better suited to environments above 1,000 endpoints where manual management becomes impractical.

The eight criteria behind this comparison are set out in how we review software.

Open the full product profiles

Use the software profiles to go deeper on pricing details, integrations, rollout fit, and editorial review before the team commits to a final vendor path. You can also explore the category pages for broader context or read the blog for buying guides.

Automox

Automox gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

PDQ Connect

PDQ Connect gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.