Atera publishes its pricing, one of the few RMM platforms that does. There are two separate plan tracks: IT Department (for internal IT teams) and MSP (for managed service providers). IT Department plans run from $149 to $219 per technician per month billed annually ($169 to $269 billed monthly).
MSP plans run from $129 to $209 per technician per month billed annually ($139 to $249 billed monthly). A 30-day free trial is available with no credit card required, which is longer than most RMM competitors including NinjaOne's 14-day trial.
The per-technician model means device count does not affect the bill. Whether a technician manages 50 endpoints or 500, the cost per technician stays fixed. This is the structural reason Atera is significantly cheaper than per-device alternatives for MSPs managing large endpoint-to-technician ratios. It is also the primary reason the comparison against NinjaOne is worth running explicitly before the decision narrows.
Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure
Use this Atera pricing page to understand commercial fit, rollout assumptions, and where pricing conversations need more detail.
The base platform across all tiers includes RMM (monitoring, alerting, remote management), OS patch management for Windows, macOS, and Linux, helpdesk ticketing, PSA billing and contract management, time tracking, network discovery, and remote access via Splashtop. Free onboarding assistance and customer support are included. This is the core value of Atera's all-in-one positioning: most competitors charge separately for RMM and PSA, or require separate tooling for billing and contract management.
What is not included at all tiers or is separately priced: endpoint security integrations (Bitdefender, Malwarebytes, SentinelOne, Emsisoft, Webroot, tier-dependent or billed through the security vendor), backup (Atera integrates with Acronis and other backup providers but does not offer native backup; backup is billed through the backup provider), advanced PSA features including custom invoice templates and complex service agreement structures at lower tiers, and TeamViewer or AnyDesk remote access if preferred over the included Splashtop.
Third-party application patch catalog depth is limited compared to NinjaOne, which is not a pricing issue but a feature gap to validate before committing.
The comparison against NinjaOne illustrates when the per-technician model wins decisively. Consider three technicians managing 800 endpoints: Atera MSP Growth at $179 per technician per month billed annually is $537 per month total. NinjaOne at the mid-range per-device rate of $2.00 per device per month across 800 endpoints is $1,600 per month.
The gap widens further when NinjaOne's add-ons (backup, MDM, ticketing, endpoint security) are included. For MSPs with high endpoint-to-technician ratios, the per-technician model does not need to win on features. It wins on economics. For internal IT departments managing small device counts with high technician ratios, the math looks different and per-device alternatives can be cheaper.
Atera pricing should be evaluated in the context of rollout scale, admin ownership, and the commercial metric that drives expansion cost over time.
Pricing pages should connect what the vendor charges to what implementation scope, support needs, and operational complexity mean for total ownership. Use this page to frame vendor conversations before final procurement.
For IT departments, the Professional tier ($149/tech/month annual) covers core monitoring, alerting, patch management, and helpdesk ticketing, sufficient for most internal IT operations that do not need advanced automation or compliance reporting. The Expert tier ($189/tech/month annual) adds automation depth and advanced reporting features.
The Master tier ($219/tech/month annual) is for teams that specifically need the highest-tier compliance controls, custom reporting, and full feature access. Most internal IT teams should start at Professional and upgrade when a specific workflow requirement makes the higher tier necessary rather than paying the Master rate upfront.
For MSPs, the Pro tier ($129/tech/month annual) covers the full RMM and PSA workflow for straightforward client management. The Growth tier ($179/tech/month annual) adds more automation and AI features, including expanded Action AI capabilities for ticket handling and scripting.
The Power tier ($209/tech/month annual) is for MSPs that need the full feature set including advanced automation policies, the deepest AI feature access, and enhanced reporting. Plan upgrades are driven by automation depth and reporting requirements rather than device count, which means the upgrade decision should be validated against specific workflow needs rather than assumed from practice size.
Atera's cost scales with technician headcount. If the team is growing by adding technicians during an expansion phase, model what the annual bill looks like at peak headcount rather than current headcount. The per-technician model is favorable when endpoint count grows faster than technician count; it becomes less favorable during a hiring phase where both grow proportionally.
The cost difference between Atera Pro ($129/tech/month annual) and Power ($209/tech/month annual) for MSPs is $80 per technician per month: $960 per technician per year for a three-technician team. Before committing to annual billing at a higher tier, confirm which specific features that tier unlocks are actually required in the first twelve months of deployment, and whether the workflows driving the upgrade are production requirements or aspirational ones.
Atera's base platform does not include backup or endpoint security. MSPs offering managed backup (typically via Acronis) and managed AV/EDR (Bitdefender, Malwarebytes, SentinelOne) pay those vendors separately. Build the full stack cost (Atera base + security vendor + backup provider) before comparing against alternatives that bundle these differently. A NinjaOne deployment with SentinelOne and Acronis backup may look closer to Atera's total cost than the headline per-device vs. per-technician comparison suggests.
Atera charges per technician per month with unlimited endpoints. IT Department plans: Professional is $149/tech/month annual ($169 monthly), Expert is $189/tech/month annual ($229 monthly), Master is $219/tech/month annual ($269 monthly). MSP plans: Pro is $129/tech/month annual ($139 monthly), Growth is $179/tech/month annual ($189 monthly), Power is $209/tech/month annual ($249 monthly). A 30-day free trial is available with no credit card required.
Yes, Atera offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. Use the trial to test patch management workflows, the PSA billing module, remote access via Splashtop, and automation policy configuration before evaluating commercial terms and annual pricing.
Atera charges per technician with unlimited endpoints. Device count does not affect the bill. Only technician headcount does. This is the structural reason Atera is significantly cheaper than per-device competitors like NinjaOne at high endpoint-to-technician ratios typical of established MSP practices.
At high endpoint-to-technician ratios, Atera is substantially cheaper. A three-technician MSP managing 800 endpoints pays roughly $387 to $627 per month for Atera depending on plan tier, versus an estimated $1,600 to $3,200 per month for NinjaOne at the same device count. At small device counts with few technicians (say, 30 endpoints with two technicians), per-device alternatives can be cheaper. Always compare at full configuration cost, including backup and endpoint security billed separately from both platforms.
No. Atera does not offer native backup. Backup is available through integrations with Acronis and other backup providers, billed separately through those vendors. MSPs offering managed backup should factor the backup provider cost into the total platform comparison.
Use the next pages below to move from pricing back into category context, product detail, alternatives, comparisons, and glossary terms.
Return to the category hub when the team needs broader buying context before narrowing further.
Check which tools in this category offer free tiers, trials, or community editions.
Check the commercial model, official pricing notes, and what to validate before procurement treats the pricing as settled.
Use alternatives when the product is credible but the buying team still needs stronger pressure-testing against competing fits.
Use comparison pages once the candidate set is specific enough for direct vendor-to-vendor evaluation.
Use glossary terms when the product page raises category language that needs a clearer operational definition.
